I suppose shirt and shoes would be nice, but I didn't see any sign that you wont be allowed to play your speakers otherwise. OTOH naked mdf is perfectly acceptable as well as XOs with their guts spilled out all over the floor...
I suppose shirt and shoes would be nice, but I didn't see any sign that you wont be allowed to play your speakers otherwise. OTOH naked mdf is perfectly acceptable as well as XOs with their guts spilled out all over the floor...
My mdf was naked this year - crossovers fully exposed, but I arrived in proper attire!
Well, there's golf and there's horseshoes. Horseshoes is usually friends and family having fun while golf can sometimes be quite stressful. Is the atmosphere at these meets more like golf, or horseshoes?
It's a lot like this forum - it's a pretty humble bunch where everyone supports & encourages their fellow DIYers. Self righteous jerks seem to stay away. It's great to see people progress and the differences in SQ at these events narrows a bit every year.
Hope you don't mind me posting a few shots of your speakers as well. It's funny, Bryan & I both snapped the same "speech" photo, but from a different camera angle! Amazing! (see the first pic on our posts).
————————-
Haha. That’s great Bill. I think my backside is also reflecting off of that mirror finish in another picture - my old Iowa shirt!! Looking forward to your other pics.
It's a lot like this forum - it's a pretty humble bunch where everyone supports & encourages their fellow DIYers. Self righteous jerks seem to stay away.
And now for something completely different (Monty Python steal)... I didn't realize how white my hair looks LOL
Craig,
This is a photographic exposure problem more than anything else. Your hair does not look this white. With flash photography, I am constantly dealing with the inverse square law. Objects closer to the flash tend to get overexposed or bleached whiter than they should be. Objects further away go darker or are underexposed. Because you were in the foreground, the flash bleached your hair white.
I try to correct this problem in Lightroom (or photoshop) by selected the overexposed areas and then reducing the overexposed area to compensate. Here are the same photos with the correction made. (Sorry for the overly technical response to your Monty Python steal!)
I won't go to that fish joint again!!! I should have gone to KFC with Nick and Ashley. That fish was nasty (and I am a sea food lover).
I’m pretty tolerant of so so food, especially when I’m out of town but Craig is right. That seafood place was not remotely good. Even their special of the night wasn’t good. The Outback was much better..... well for a chain anyway. It’s hard for me to find a good steak when you’re used to Chicago steak houses.
Comments
Craig,
This is a photographic exposure problem more than anything else. Your hair does not look this white. With flash photography, I am constantly dealing with the inverse square law. Objects closer to the flash tend to get overexposed or bleached whiter than they should be. Objects further away go darker or are underexposed. Because you were in the foreground, the flash bleached your hair white.
I try to correct this problem in Lightroom (or photoshop) by selected the overexposed areas and then reducing the overexposed area to compensate. Here are the same photos with the correction made. (Sorry for the overly technical response to your Monty Python steal!)
Ron
They have margaritas.
Ron